When a distribution is skewed due to outliers, researchers can choose whether to present the median or the mean to readers, depending on which measurement best supports their pointand some could argue that this is a way for researchers to use statistics to "lie." How do you feel about the fact that researchers can present numerical data in the way that best suits their purposes? Does this cause any ethical dilemma for you, or is it simply good strategy? Explain why you feel the way you do