When Noelle was visiting her mother, she bought her a gift of a stereo from a new and used dealer. Noelle told the store clerk that it is a gift for her mother. The stereo stopped working and the mother called the store repairman. The repairman tried to fix it, but he could not find the problem. Noelle's mother tried to return the stereo to the store and the store clerk told her that the stereo was used and had no warranty, but nothing was marked on the receipt to that effect, so she sued the store for breach of contract. There is no privity of contract between Noelle's mother and the store so she would not win a breach of contract suit Since Noelle's mother can show the stereo is not working and cannot be made to do so, she can prove under the sale of Goods Act that there has been a breach of the contract with her and she will win. Since the store knew that the television was a gift for her, and Noelle cannot enforce the contract because she lives in the US and her mother lives in Canada, the judge will treat the contract as one between Noelle's mother and the store. B and C. None of the above are true