Question
When Sarbanes-Oxley passed, a major criticism of the legislation by publicly traded companies was that its implementation would be extremely expensive. This was indeed the
When Sarbanes-Oxley passed, a major criticism of the legislation by publicly traded companies was that its implementation would be extremely expensive. This was indeed the case in the early stages of implementation, but now there are many frameworks and resources available (such as COSO) to assist in properly complying with the law.
Do you think that this cost is justified if it leads to better internal controls? Will the criminal liability of company officers effectively prevent management override of internal controls resulting in fraud? Is there quantitative proof that SOX has been effective in preventing fraud?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started