Which of our discussed techniques is this best an example of$?$

Moderator: Does the question, Governor Brown, of Mr$.$ Clinton's recent problems, lead you to believe he has an electability problem?"

Brown: "I believe he has a big electability problem."

Moderator: "Well, what do you think it is$?"$

Brown: "I'll tell you what it is$.$ It was right in the front of the Washington Post today. He is funneling money to his wife's law firm for state business. That's number one. Number two: his wife's law firm is representing clients before the State of Arkansas agencies. His appointees. And one of the keys is the poultry industry, which his wife's law firm represents, and to read the local Chicago Tribune, 'there's two hundred and seventy miles that are polluted with fecal coliform bacteria and are unsafe for humans or fish'. So it is not only corruption, it is an environmental disaster and it is the kind of conflict of interest that is incompatible in the kind of public servant we expect from the President of the United States."

Moderator: $"$It doesn't sound like you could run as his vice$-$president."

Brown: No$,$ it doesn't."

Moderator: $"$Mr$.$ Clinton, uh$,$ you want to take a swing at all that stuff?"

Clinton: "I feel sorry for Jerry Brown. I served with him as Governor in the late seventies. He asked me to support him for President once."

Moderator: "Did you?"

Clinton: $"$Of course not. You know, he reinvents himself every year or two. In $1990,$ he was pleading with the courts in California not to impose any limits on contributions. His law firm took $$178,000$ of taxpayer's money, taxpayer's money to beat a contribution limit initiative in $1990$ and so I don't think you can take much of what he says seriously."

#$03-$ Tu Quoque

#$10-$ Appeal to Spite

#$18-$ False Dichotomy

#$21-$ Quotation Out of Context