Which of the following is NOT a difference in what Rawls and Friedman want in terms of regulation?

1. Friedman thinks that the biggest issue with healthcare regulation is that there are market failures, whereas Rawls thinks the biggest issue is that a lack of healthcare undermines someone's development of their two moral powers.

2. Rawls thinks that we need an equality of opportunity that gives similar chances to the similarly endowed, whereas Friedman thinks that everyone needs an equal right to participate and compete.

3. Rawls thinks that healthcare is important to the value of most basic rights and liberties, but Friedman doesn't think that is the case.

4. Friedman thinks that economic liberties are just as important as political and civil liberties, and wants to protect both. Rawls only cares about the latter.