Which of the following is true of liability for torts and crimes in corporations?

• When a corporate officer could have prevented an employee's tort but did not, the officer may be liable.
• When a corporate officer did not know of the employee's crime or tort, the officer is still liable.
• If the employee commits a crime or tort while acting outside the scope of employment, the corporation is liable.
• If an employee commits a tort within the scope of employment but outside the office space, the corporation is not liable.