Which of the following options is most correct? The Court in Rossouw v Sachs 1964 (2) SA 551 (A) held that a person detained in terms of section 17 of Act 37 of 1963 - Question 7Answer a. Was not entitled to access reading and writing materials, as it was the intention of the legislature to induce detainees to answer all questions satisfactorily. b. Was entitled to access reading and writing materials, as detainees retained all rights under the common law, unless excluded expressly by the legislation. c. Was not entitled to access reading and writing materials, as the Act expressly excluded this right. d. Was entitled to access reading and writing materials, in line with the common law presumption that legislation does not affect existing rights more than necessary