Which of the following responses best represents the holding of the court in Soldano v$.$ Daniels:

A$.$ The bar and bartender owed a duty to the dead man because of the special legal relationship that the operator of a tavern or inn has with customers and visitors to the premises.

B$.$ The bar and bartender did not owe a duty to the dead man because there is no duty to act under the circumstances.

C$.$ While the bar and bartender owed a duty to the dead man, the plaintiff could not recover because the conduct of the bartender did not cause the injury.

D$.$ Public policy supported finding that the bartender owed a duty not to interfere with the visiting patrons attempt to use the phone.