Which of the following statements about crafting a strategy to be competitively successful in the markets for action cameras and drones is not true?

GLO$-$BUS has no built$-$in bias that favors any one strategy or approach to competing over all the others.

In GLO$-$BUS, there are multiple strategic approaches and sets of competitive efforts$/$action that, if properly designed and well$-$executed, are capable of producing competitive success in the global market for cameras$/$drones$,$ provided they are not overpowered or thwarted by even more potent strategic approaches and competitive actions$/$efforts that are well$-$executed by rival companies.

So long as a company had higher earnings per share than any other rival in the most recent year, there is no compelling need for its managers to make changes or adjustments in the company's strategy and competitive actions$/$efforts simply to respond to the shifting strategies and competitive efforts of rival companies that are actively striving to improve their overall performance.

So long as your company's competitive efforts$/$actions and decision entries produce an overall buyer appeal for your camera$/$drone product line as compared to the offerings of rival companies across the $4$ geographic regions and so long as your company exerts sufficiently aggressive competitive efforts $($on the $11$ competitive factors for cameras and $10$ competitive factors for drones$)$ that compare favorably with the competitive efforts of rivals in the $4$ regions, then you can expect a satisfactory$-$to$-$good$-$to$-$appealingly large percentage of buyers in each region to prefer purchasing your cameras$/$drones instead of rival company brands.