Which of the following statements does not illustrate Justices Ginsburg's and Souter's dissent in the Cabballes case? Group of answer choices The use of the drug detecting canine officer converted the traffic stop to a Terry-type encounter that was not reasonably related to the circumstances that initially justified the traffic stop, and was neither triggered by reasonable suspicion of the presence of narcotics, and therefore, impermissibly violated the 4th Amendment. Driving 6 miles above the speed limit does not provide the police with reasonable suspicion to believe that the driver's car contained narcotics. A dog-sniff by a dog trained to detect explosives would be an entirely different matter. All of these answers illustrate Justices Ginsburg's and Souter's dissent in the Cabballes case