Which of the following statements sum up the argument by Justice Young n Architectural Systems, Inc. (ASI) v. Gilbane Building Co.? Gilbane did not owe ASI the payments ASI demanded because, as a condition precedent, Gilbane would pay ASI only once it had received payment for the owner of the project. Gilbane did not owe ASI the payments ASI demanded because, as a condition precedent, Gilbane does not have to pay ASI if it is established that ASI must pay Gilbane first. Gilbane did not owe ASI the payments ASI demanded because a condition precedent existed, which allowed Gilbane to withhold payments whenever it felt necessary. Gilbane owed ASI the payments ASI demanded because, as a condition precedent, whe 10 days pass without paying ASI back, then ASI has a right to demand the appropriate payments