Which one of the choices illustrates the principle used in the following argument? $>>>>>$ Some property developers have discovered that designing energy$-$efficient buildings can provide them with a 'green premium'. The government$-$backed Energy Star programme has been designed to identify and promote products that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Researchers found that the positive impact on the selling prices of 'green buildings' was around $16\%.$ The value of rents was also significantly enhanced by the Energy Star label. If taking advantage of the green premium to increase a company's profits has positive consequences for the environment, then it is all to the good. Outcomes are all that matter, contrary to the view of many green campaigners that, unless a policy is motivated purely by environmental concern, there is no virtue in it$.$Your answer:Research into drugs that maximise the profits of the big pharmaceutical companies is desirable if the result is that more lives are saved. Unless a firm makes fair pay and good conditions a top priority for its workers, it cannot be judged a good employer. Longer prison sentences should be imposed on the criminal minority for the benefits of the large majority of citizens who are law$-$abiding. Reductions in expenditure on some public services should be welcomed if the result is more money for schools and hospitals. Awards should only be given to individuals or organisations that intentionally put the good of others before their own advantage.Clear answer