?

Which one of the following is not an attractive way to reduce the design, assembly, marketing, and other costs per action-capture camera sold in an effort to achieve a sizable low-cost competitive advantage over rivals? Copyright @ by Glo-Bus Software, Inc. Copying, distributing, or 3rd party website posting isexpressly prohibited and constitutes copyright violation. Paying PAT members an attractive assembly quality incentive to help reduce warranty claims on cameras sold and also boost PAT productivity Spending aggressively (but also taking care not to overspend) on camera product R&D Trying different combinations of components, product enhancements, and extra performance features to be used in action cameras in order to discover the lowest cost combination for achieving a competitively appealing P/Q rating Striving to keeping marketing costs per action camera sold in all 4 geographic regions to levels that are several dollars below the industry-average benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal) Pursuing actions to keep the company's warranty period in each region below the all- company average and, more ideally, close to the industry-low benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal)