Who is the defendant? Who should I include as opposing counsel?This is request for Special Set Hearing Since The Firm requested this Hearing should only defendant be Alfred James ? Should I include the name Alfred James or only his company? Alfred James is a world-renownedpainter and longtime Firm client,with his office at 1 Paint Street,Your City, Your State. Alfredcoordinated a meeting with HaroldCurbside, the Operations Managerof Stantond Cars, Inc., a largeautomobile dealer with a repaircenter, with its office at 1 AutoAvenue, Your City, Your State. Priorto the meeting, The Firm formed abusiness for Alfred called JamesPaints, Inc. Alfred uses the businessto protect his intellectual propertyand any assets he creates andformulates. The purpose of themeeting was for Alfred to present anew paint that he developed tokeep cars cooler, prevent fading,and prevent chipping. Alfred offered the product to StantondCars, Inc. in exchange for a fee of$500 per car on which the paint isapplied for a full paint job, and$100 per car for any touch upusage. The fees are paid monthly,on or before the 15th of eachmonth, with an accounting ofusage.The next year, after the contractwas completed, Alfred wascontacted by Harold, whoexpressed concern about severalemployees who work in the bodyshop at Stantond Cars, Inc. usingthe new paint, who developed aseries of medical problems,including cancer. Alfred, throughhis business, purchased themanufactured paint from Sealco Inc., located at 222 Safety Way,Your City, Your State. It turns outSealco, Inc. did not use Alfred'sformula for the paintmanufacturing, and, instead, usedlead-based products withoutAlfred's knowledge or consent.A month later, a lawsuit was filedby Vanessa Fox, a body shopworker at Stantond Cars, Inc., wholives at 567 West Street, Your City,Your State, for her injuries allegingthe paint as the ca se of hecancer. Vanessa's attorney isHeniger Hemshaw, Esq, 4377 UsurpDrive, Your City, Your State.Vanessa sues Stantond Cars, Inc.,James Paints, Inc., and Sealco, Inc.Alfred retains The Firm forrepresentation of James Paints, Inc.in the litigation, asking that TheFirm seek dismissal, since Alfredwas unaware of the change inmanufacturing specifications. AMotion to Dismiss is filed. The Firmrequests a special set hearing on the motion. The motion is denied.After a few months of litigation,and to end the matter prior toadditional publicity or riskproduction of the trade secrets, thematter is resolved for $100,000.Alfred becomes concerned abouthis brand and decides to operatehis business as Coolco Paint, Inc.changing the name from JamesPaints, Inc.

Name of Opposing Counsel or Pro Se Litigant: James Paints, Inc. Name of Opposing Counsel or Pro Se Address: 1 Paint Street Litigant: Phone: Address: Fax: Phone: Email: Fax: Legal Assistant Name: Email: Legal Assistant's Email: Legal Assistant Name: Legal Assistant's Email: Name of Opposing Counsel or Pro Se Name of Opposing Coun: 1 or Pro Se Litigant: Litigant: Address: Address: Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Email: Email: Legal Assistant Name: Legal Assistant Name: Legal Assistant's Email: Legal Assistant's Email: PRINT Name of Counsel or Pro Se Litigant Requesting the Special Set Hearing/ DATE: Phone: Fax: Legal Assistant's Name: Legal Assistant's Email