Why, primarily, did Justice Gageler in the High Court in Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery [2019] HCA 11 take issue with the judgments of the other Justices?

Select one:

a.His Honour reasoned that structured proportionality is not the soundest method by which Australian Judges ought to adjudicate on the constitutionality of restrictions on political communication.

b.His Honour opined that the prohibition on protest in the particular case at hand was disproportionate and therefore unlawful.

c.His Honour took issue with the proposition that individuals' access to abortion clinics was at all relevant to the maintenance of the constitutionally prescribed system of responsible and representative government.

d.His Honour questioned whether it was at all proper for the High Court to read into the Constitution such a powerful implied freedom as is that of political communication.