Will someone help me turn this "body of work" into a well written paper based on the "Assignment Expectations" I believe it's at about 90% done but I need help with the conclusion and adding the references into it where they belong. I tried to upload the word document, but I don't believe it will let me, so I pasted it here under "body of work". Thank you!

Assignment Expectations

• For this Case study, we will be looking at a fictional case of a manager caught between a rock and hard place. Nick Cunningham is a manager at Synergon, a high-powered company involved in purchasing poorly managed companies and then restructuring them to become more profitable. However, Synergon has now purchased Beauchamp, Becker, and Company, which is a well-managed and highly profitable company.
• Nick is in an awkward position because he is in charge of managing this merger, but he also knows that the success of the merger is dependent on Beauchamp's managing director and other top leaders remaining in their positions and continuing their solid work. However, Nick's bosses are not known for taking a conciliatory approach towards companies they purchase and usually force major changes on any company that they acquire. Predictably, Nick is faced with a threat of retirement by Beauchamp's managing director Julian Mansfield due to Synergon's strict policies and approach.
• Before beginning the Case Assignment, make sure you have thoroughly reviewed the tutorial and textbook readings from the background materials. Pay special attention to readings on causes of conflict, types of conflict, and conflict management styles. For this assignment you will need to apply concepts from the background materials to this fictional case.
• Once you have finished reviewing the background materials, take a look at this following article and think about how the concepts from the background materials apply to this fictional case:

Cliffe, S. (1999). Can This Merger Be Saved? Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 28-44. [EbscoHost]

• Then write a 4- to 5-page paper addressing the following questions:

1. Do you think this conflict that Nick Cunningham faces is functional or dysfunctional? Explain your reasoning, and cite Bauer and Erdogan (2011) or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer.
2. What is the source of this conflict? Use the terminology from Bauer and Erdogan (2011), or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer. For example, is this conflict a result of relationship/interpersonal issues? Or from tasks/roles? Other?
3. Of the five styles of conflict management discussed in Shearhouse (2011) or Bauer and Erdogan (2011) which one do you think would be the best approach for Nick Cunningham to take?
4. What other advice would you give Nick Cunningham based on the concepts discussed in any of the background readings?

• Case Assignments are to be prepared in Microsoft Word and should be 4 to 5 pages in length, in addition to a cover page (course name and number, module number, session name, student name, and date prepared) and a reference list. The paper should be double-spaced, using 12 pt. type in the Times New Roman font. It should consist of a 2- or 3-sentence introduction, a body, and a 2- or 3-sentence conclusion and use Trident University International's cover page. The reference list page must be in APA format.
• Assignment content should include a brief introduction to the assignment, background information about the organization being studied, and discussion in terms of the concepts or theories being applied in the assignment.
• Use headings and subheadings to improve presentation values.
• Include both a References page and in-text citations.Attention is to be given to citing sources of information in-text as well as in the References page at the end of the paper. Citation and reference style instructions are available athttps://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/, Trident University's Introduction toAPA Style, 7th edition, or at APAstyle.org.
• Since you are engaging in research, be sure to cite and reference the sources in APA format. The paper should be written in the third person; this means words like "I," "we," and "you" are not appropriate. For more information, see Differences Between First and Third Person.

Body of Work:

Introduction

Nick Cunningham plays the role of a manager at Synergon in the case study. His primary responsibility is to oversee the management of a merger with Beauchamp, Becker, and Company. However, he is in a difficult situation because he is aware that the success of the merger is contingent on Beauchamp's managing director and other top leaders maintaining in their positions and their productive work.

As a result, he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. On the other hand, Nick's superiors are not known for adopting a conciliatory attitude toward the businesses that they acquire, and they often impose significant modifications on any business that they purchase. As was to be expected, Nick is confronted with the possibility of retirement by Julian Mansfield, the managing director of Beauchamp, as a direct result of Synergon's stringent policies and approach.

QUESTION 1

Nick Cunningham is dealing with a situation that is deeply dysfunctional. According to Bauer and Erdogan (2011), conflict is "a process that begins when one party feels that the interests of another party are being opposed or threatened by the interests of the first party" (p.247). Organizational conflict is defined by Luthans et al. (2015) as "a process that begins when one party feels that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively influence, something that the first party cares about." [Citation needed] (p.258). In this particular instance, Nick Cunningham is under the impression that Beauchamp's managing director Julian Mansfield poses a risk to Synergon's business pursuits.

Nick Cunningham is in a difficult position because he is responsible for managing the merger between Synergon and Beauchamp, but he also knows that the success of the merger is dependent on Beauchamp's managing director and other top leaders remaining in their positions and continuing to do solid work. This places Nick Cunningham in a difficult position. On the other hand, Nick's superiors are not known for adopting a conciliatory attitude toward the businesses that they acquire, and they often impose significant modifications on any business that they purchase. As was to be expected, Nick is confronted with the possibility of retirement by Julian Mansfield, the managing director of Beauchamp, as a direct result of Synergon's stringent policies and approach.

The struggle that Nick Cunningham is going through is a dysfunctional conflict since it is hindering him from carrying out his job duties in an efficient manner. According to Bauer and Erdogan (2011), conflict is "a process that begins when one party feels that the interests of another party are being opposed or threatened by the interests of the first party" (p.247). Organizational conflict is defined by Luthans et al. (2015) as "a process that begins when one party feels that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively influence, something that the first party cares about." [Citation needed] (p.258). In this particular instance, Nick Cunningham is under the impression that Beauchamp's managing director Julian Mansfield poses a risk to Synergon's business pursuits. Nick is in a difficult position because of the conflict; he is trapped between two sides who have competing interests. As a result, he is unable to perform his work in an efficient manner.

Nick has a number of options available to him for attempting to find a solution to this disagreement. He may try to arbitrate between Synergon and Beauchamp, he could try to encourage Synergon to take a more conciliatory approach towards Beauchamp, or he could try to convince Beauchamp to accept Synergon's policies. All of these options are on the table. On the other hand, it is quite doubtful that any of these potential remedies will be entirely successful. The most effective way for Nick to settle this disagreement would be for him to take a proactive stance and make an effort to stop it from occurring in the first place.

Before the merger takes place, Nick could try to avoid the occurrence of this dispute by having conversations with both Synergon and Beauchamp. This would be done in anticipation of the event. He might explain to Beauchamp the policies that Synergon is likely to pursue after the merger, as well as explain the importance of maintaining Beauchamp's top leaders in their positions. He could also explain to Synergon why it is important to keep Beauchamp's top executives in their roles. Nick would be able to establish expectations on both sides if he did this, and he would hopefully be able to avoid any surprises that could result in conflict.

Nick could also try to prevent this dispute from occurring by mediating between Synergon and Beauchamp in an effort to find a solution that satisfies the needs of both parties. He could try to persuade Synergon to let Beauchamp's top leaders have a place at the table throughout the process of restructuring, and he could try to persuade Beauchamp to embrace some of Synergon's policies. Both of these options are possible. Nick would be able to appease all sides and, with any luck, steer clear of a confrontation if he could just find a happy medium.

Nick should prioritize avoiding the escalation of this disagreement in whatever way he can since doing so is the single most important thing he can do. If he is successful in doing so, he will be in a position to successfully manage the merger and contribute to the continued growth and prosperity of both Synergon and Beauchamp.

QUESTION 2

Interpersonal interactions are what led to the conflict. Nick Cunningham, the manager, and Julian Mansfield, the managing director of Beauchamp, are going head to head on this issue. The disagreement originates from the fact that Nick and Julian go about their respective jobs in quite different ways. Nick holds a managerial position at Synergon, an organization that specializes in the acquisition and reorganization of badly managed businesses. Recently, Synergon has completed the acquisition of Beauchamp, a company that is both well-managed and very profitable.

Nick is in charge of overseeing the merger, but he is well aware that the success of the merger is contingent on Beauchamp's leaders continuing in their current roles and their productive work. On the other hand, Nick's superiors are not known for adopting a conciliatory attitude toward the businesses that they acquire, and they often impose significant modifications on any business that they purchase. Since of this, Nick is placed in a challenging situation because he does not want to make Julian angry, but he is also aware that he needs to adhere to the policies of Synergon. Predictably, Synergon's ideas and approaches cause Julian to feel threatened, and he threatens to retire if Nick does not adopt a more conciliatory attitude to the situation.

There are a few different approaches that could be taken to settle this dispute. Nick could try to persuade Synergon to rethink its strategy towards the merger, which is one of the options available to him. This would be tough to accomplish, but it would be doable if Nick could demonstrate that the continuation of Beauchamp's leaders in their current roles is necessary for the successful completion of the merger. Nick also has the choice of attempting to persuade Julian to continue his employment at Beauchamp and see the merger through to completion.

If Nick can convince Julian that he is dedicated to safeguarding Beauchamp's interests and that he is prepared to collaborate with Julian to facilitate a seamless transition, then this might be feasible. Finally, Nick may attempt to establish a middle ground between the strategy used by Synergon and the issues raised by Julian. As a result of this, Nick may have to collaborate closely with Julian to design a transition strategy that caters to both of their requirements. It is essential that Nick conveys his decision to Synergon as well as Julian, regardless of which path he decides to pursue in this situation.

One example of an interpersonal conflict is the disagreement that has arisen between Nick and Julian. Conflicts in interpersonal relationships are frequently brought on by fundamentally dissimilar personality types or methods of approaching a common task. It is crucial to strive to find a resolution that is acceptable to both parties, despite the fact that it could be difficult to do so in some cases.

QUESTION 3

From my vantage point, the strategy of problem-solving is the one that would serve Nick Cunningham most effectively in this situation. In this strategy, the parties involved collaborate in order to develop a solution that is advantageous to both of them. To be successful with this strategy, you need to have strong communication and negotiation abilities, in addition to a willingness to compromise.

The technique to conflict management known as problem-solving is frequently considered to be the superior choice since it requires all parties involved to collaborate in order to identify a solution that is advantageous to all involved. To be successful with this strategy, you need to have strong communication and negotiation abilities, in addition to a willingness to compromise.

The approach that focuses on finding solutions to problems would be advantageous for Nick Cunningham because it would enable him to maintain the status quo at Beauchamp while at the same time effecting the essential organizational reforms that are required. This strategy would also make it possible for him to keep a positive relationship with the leaders of the Beauchamp organization, which would be advantageous for any future business deals.

The method that focuses on finding solutions to problems is not always the most convenient choice because it requires both parties to be willing to make concessions. Nevertheless, in this particular scenario, it appears to be the most viable alternative for Nick Cunningham.

QUESTION 4

Aside from the information that has already been presented in the background readings, I would recommend to Nick Cunningham that he make an effort to negotiate with Julian Mansfield and the other prominent leaders at Beauchamp. He ought to make an effort to reach a consensus regarding the modifications that Synergon intends to implement at Beauchamp and how the implementation of those modifications will have an impact on the work of the leaders at Beauchamp. In addition to this, he needs to work towards reaching a consensus over the future of Beauchamp's management team once the merger has been finalized.

It is possible that Nick Cunningham will be able to reach a consensus with Julian Mansfield and the other senior officials at Beauchamp regarding the modifications that Synergon intends to implement there if he is successful in his negotiations with them. Additionally, it is possible that he will be able to reach a consensus regarding the future of Beauchamp's top executives once the merger has been finalized. This has the ability to stop the leaders at Beauchamp from retiring, which would be helpful in ensuring that the merger is successful.

Conclusion

?????

References

Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2012). Chapter 10: Conflict and negotiations. Organizational Behavior.

Cliffe, S. (1999). Can This Merger Be Saved? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

https://hbr.org/1999/01/can-this-merger-be-saved

Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2015). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-based Approach (Vol. Thirteenth edition). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.

Shearouse, S. H., & Books24x7, I. (2011). Conflict 101: A manager's guide to resolving problems soeveryone can get back to work. US: Amacom.