Wilson owns property close to the beach. His land, however, does not have direct access to the beach. Wilson's neighbor, Greta, owns property that has access to the beach. Wilson orally agrees to pay Greta $1,000 for the right to lay a 3-foot-wide brick path from the edge of his property, across her land, and to the beach. Under the terms of the agreement,Wilson will be able to use the path whenever he chooses. Wilson paysGreta the $1,000 in cash, but never got a receipt. After 6 months, Gretaunilaterally pulls up the path and tells Wilson to get lost. Wilson sues Greta forcontinued access to the beach on the grounds that this is an enforceablecontract for an interest in land. On these facts, who prevails? Be sure to explain the reasons for your answer.