Wonder Woman was paying a visit to Batman so she flew her invisible jet over to the Bat Cave and parked it outside. As she approached the Bat Cave the camouflage covering began to open. Wonder Woman started to walk into the Bat Cave and a piece of the camouflage cave cover fell down and damage the nose of the invisible jet. Gotham City had a law that all mechanical cave openings had to be secured with high intensity lead screws to protect pedestrians that might walk by from loose rock falling on them and causing injury to people.

Batman's cave camouflage design only used super stick specialized glue which was designed to be stronger than high intensity lead screws but less suspicious if super villains used x-ray or other scanning devices to locate the cave entrance. Batman and Alfred were inside the cave when the cave was opening and nobody else had ay control over the mechanism to open the cave door.

Wonder Woman is suing Batman for the $10,000 damage done to the nose of her invisible jet.

Please utilize the following to analyze whether Wonder Woman would succeed at a claim of negligence. Do not go any further than the given prompts:

Wonder Woman v. Batman Please give the definition of negligence.

Duty

Please IRAC if Batman owed any duty to Wonder Woman regarding the damage done to her invisible jet.

Breach There are three ways to prove a breach of duty: Name them and IRAC each to determine if Batman breached any duty owed to Wonder Woman regarding the damage done to her invisible jet.

Causation In order to succeed at a claim of negligence, the plaintiff must show the defendant's conduct was the actual and proximate cause of harm.

Actual Cause Please IRAC actual cause utilizing the appropriate tests.

Proximate Cause Please IRAC Proximate Cause utilize the appropriate theories.

Damages What Damages has Wonder Woman incurred and if liability for negligence is found, for what would Batman be held liable.