Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Wood v. State is aninvented (i.e.completely fictional) case decided by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Maryland's intermediate appellate court. The case was decided in

Wood v. Stateis aninvented (i.e.completely fictional) case decided by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Maryland's intermediate appellate court. The case was decided in 2019 in a reported opinionlocated at 109 A.3d 454. You need to quote material found on page 458. Cite the complete opinion from the intermediate appellate court - including thepincite page- inBluebookformat.

Case Below:

2019 WL 2419228

Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.

UNREPORTED*

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Ryheeme RobertWOOD

v.

STATEof Maryland

No. 460, Sept. Term, 2018

June 10, 2019

Circuit Court for Washington County, Case No: 21-K-14-050551

Fader, C.J.,Berger,Arthur, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*1In 2015, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Washington County convicted appellant, Ryheeme RobertWood, of illegal possession of a regulated firearm, illegal possession of ammunition, and wearing, carrying, and transporting a handgun in a vehicle on a public highway. The court sentenced Mr.Woodto 15 years' imprisonment, all but 12 years suspended, with the first five years without the possibility of parole, for the illegal possession of a firearm offense and to lesser concurrent terms for the other two convictions. This Court affirmed the judgments.Woodv.State,No. 2254, September Term, 2015 (filed February 22, 2017).

In 2018, Mr.Woodfiled a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant toMd. Rule 4-345(a)in which he asserted that the court erred in ordering that the first five years of his sentence be served without the possibility of parole because theStatehad not provided advance notice of its intent to seek the mandatory minimum sentence. The circuit court denied the motion. We shall affirm because Mr.Wood'ssentence is legal and his claim of a procedural error in the sentencing proceeding is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law Cases Materials And Problems

Authors: Russell L. Weaver, Steven I. Friedland, Richard D. Rosen

5th Edition

1543830447, 978-1543830446

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

=+24. Friday the 13th, accidents. The researchers in Exercise

Answered: 1 week ago