Would this be a

1. Mens rea Crown must prove actus reus (prohibited act) was committed AND mens rea (that accused had intent) 2. Strict liability offence: Crown must prove actus reus. Once Crown proves this, then the defendant can escape liability if can prove due diligence or reasonable belief in mistaken set of facts (which if true would make the act or omission innocent) 3. Absolute liability: Crown only needs to prove actus reus in order to have the defendant convicted.

?