Wrecked Furniture. Ralph buys new furniture for his living room from Good Times Furniture. It is agreed that the goods will be placed with a common carrier for delivery. The contract between Ralph and Good Times is ambiguous regarding whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods only to the common carrier's hands or whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods to Ralph's home. Unfortunately, on the way to Ralph's home, through no fault of the delivery driver, the delivery truck was wrecked and the furniture was significantly damaged. Which of the following is true regarding the risk of loss at the time the goods were damaged? 1) The risk of loss was with the furniture store. 2) The risk of loss was with Ralph. 3) The risk of loss was split equally between Ralph and the furniture store. 4) The risk of loss was with Ralph, but only if the driver is determined to be an agent of the furniture store. 5) The risk of loss was with the furniture store, but only if the driver is determined to be an agent of the furniture store