WRITE A response to response 1 from response D? 1. **Agreement on Complexity of Murder Charge:** - Both responses recognize the complexity of charging Burrage with murder due to the presence of other drugs in Banka's system. This is a valid point, as it complicates establishing a direct causal link between Burrage's actions and Banka's death. I agree with this assessment, as it highlights a significant challenge for the prosecution. 2. **Involuntary Manslaughter:** - Both responses suggest involuntary manslaughter as a potential charge. Response D provides a clear explanation that Burrage's reckless behavior in selling heroin could meet the criteria for involuntary manslaughter, which involves unintentional death caused by negligent behavior. I agree with this point, as it aligns with the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter. 3. **Second-Degree Murder:** - Response D introduces the possibility of second-degree murder, arguing that Burrage's knowledge of the risks associated with heroin could support this charge. I find this point compelling, as it considers the defendant's awareness of the potential consequences of his actions. However, I acknowledge that proving the necessary mental state for second-degree murder might be challenging given the circumstances, which is a potential area of disagreement. 4. **Focus on Mental State:** - Response D emphasizes the importance of establishing Burrage's mental state, which is crucial for both involuntary mansla