Write this more flowing and with vivid adjectives and adverbs.

Judge Jon DeGuilio may have not known right away that the documents presented at the trials in both the New York case and the Indiana properties were forged and fabricated but by the middle of the second trial, he certainly knew. DeGiullio also knew that he never had jurisdiction for more than one reason. In order for the court to have federal jurisdiction 18 USC 1343, the federal wire fraud statute mandates that the defendant use interstate communication to obtain or attempt to obtain money or property by fraud.

Since all of the transactions in the seven counts closed that precludes it being an attempt. In this case I would have had to obtain money or property at the alleged victim's expense. Since that never happened the court never had federal jurisdiction. That is jurisdiction 101. That should have been the first thing the judge noticed. however it wasn't until after the trials that he realized this. All he had to do is read the New York indictment and would have known because it is invalid on its face. It says right there that I used Phyllis' credit to obtain property and charged me in each count for obtaining property by fraud but then clearly states both in the charges and in the indictment that Phyllis purchased the two properties listed in the three counts.

DeGuilio also did not have subject matter jurisdiction because on the Indiana properties, I was accused of forging applications for the first time at the trial. Prior to that I had no idea I was accused of those charges in violation of the Sixth Amendment's clause protecting the right tobe informed of the nature and cause of the accusation. On the New York properties DeGuilio also did not have personal jurisdiction because Nana closed on them in New York and was a resident of Chicago. In addition, anything prior to the closings in New York was outside of the five-year statute of limitations. When a judge does not have jurisdiction he becomes personally liable.