Yates contracted with Waterworks, Inc. to have an above ground pool installed in his backyard. Waterworks specialized in the sale and construction of pools. The two parties entered into a contract that called for Waterworks to "furnish all labor and materials to construct a Wavecrest brand pool, and furnish and install pool with vinyl liners." The total cost for materials and labor was $3,690. There was no breakdown of costs between labor and materials. After the pool was installed, its sides began bowing out, the 2" 4" wooden supports became rotted and misaligned, tilting the pool. Yates brought suit alleging that Waterworks had violated several provisions of Article 2 of the UCC. a) Using the IRAC method, discuss whether the transaction was one involving "goods" making it subject to Article 2 of the UCC. b) If we assume that Article 2 applies, under what warranty theory (or theories) might a lawsuit be brought (IRAC not required)