Yates contracted with Waterworks, Inc. to have an above ground pool installed in his backyard. Waterworks specialized in the sale and construction of pools.The two parties entered into a contract that called for Waterworks to "furnish all labor and materials to construct a Wavecrest brand pool, and furnish and install pool with vinyl liners."The total cost for materials and labor was $3,690.There was no breakdown of costs between labor and materials.After the pool was installed, its sides began bowing out, the 2" x 4" wooden supports became rotted and misaligned, tilting the pool.Yates brought suit alleging that Waterworks had violated several provisions of Article 2 of the UCC.

a) Using the IRAC method, discuss whether the transaction was one involving "goods" making it subject to Article 2 of the UCC.

b) If we assume that Article 2 applies, under what warranty theory (or theories) might a lawsuit be brought (IRAC not required)?