you are a licensed paralegal representing his majesty the king. draft closing argument for the case with relevant laws l. mention the issues

legal part of the case supporting evidence

facts

Relief

put subheading

Provmaal UTTEHCES EOUI'II II'IE LIqUOl' LICENCE L'ase Treetop Catering Inc and Victoria Levens, its sole director, officer, and shareholder, have been charged with an offence under the Liquor Licence Act, RSO 1990, c L19. Treetop Catering Inc was hired by the Simpson Advocacy Club to organize and manage a party for its members being held at the Simpson Academy student lounge. The lounge included an indoor bar and a fenced outdoor patio area. In addition to a bartender, Treetop Catering Inc hired a security guard to ensure that guests did not take alcohol outside the fenced patio. The party became quite noisy, and a neighbour, Patrick Elder, called the police to complain. When the police officer, Constable Matthew Lee, arrived, he found empty beer bottles and plastic wine glasses on the lawn outside the patio. He therefore charged Treetop Catering Inc and Victoria Levens with the offence of permitting the removal of alcohol from the premises as prohibited under RRO 1990, Regulation 7'19 of the Liquor Lr'cence Act. At the trial, the justice of the peace will have to decide whether the defendants are guilty or not guilty. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must first prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants permitted the removal of alcohol from the licensed area of the premises. If the prosecution does so, the defendants must then prove, on a balance of probabilities, that they had taken all reasonable steps to comply with the law