You are working for a consultancy company which has been using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in conjunction with a client. The consultant who has been dealing with the client has just resigned and left the company and you have been asked by your superior to check their calculations. You have been given the pairwise comparison matrix for three objectives being considered by the client company: Here, for example, the judgement as to objective 1 as compared with objective 3 is rated 9 . (a) You have been told that the consultant who has just resigned had concluded that these judgements were not reasonably consistent. Would you agree with this or not (qive your reasons)? Assume the value of RI for n=3 is 0.58 . (b) The relative judgment of two possible courses of action (A and B ) for the client company with respect to the above three objectives is: Assuming that the judgements made with respect to the three objectives are reasonably consistent, which course of action (A or B) should the client company take? (5 marks) c) The client company has now sent you an email stating that they had made a mistake in their objective by objective evaluation and it should have been: Would this mistake alter your conclusion in (a) above? Give your reasons. (6 marks)