You learned in intermediate macroeconomics that certain macroeconomic growth models predict conditional convergence or a catch up effect in per capita GDP between the countries of the world. That is, countries which are further behind initially in per-capita GDP will grow faster than the leader. You gather data from the Penn World Tables to test this theory. (a) By limiting your sample to 24 OECD countries, you hope to have a more homogeneous set of countries in your sample, i.e., countries that are not too different with respect to their institutions. To simplify matters, you decide to only test for unconditional convergence. In that case, the laggards catch up even without taking into account differences in some of the driving variables. Your scatter plot and regression for the time period 1975-1989 are as follows: g8975 = 0 d .024 (0.06) 0.005 (0.008) P CGDP75 US; R2 = 0.025. where g8975 is the average annual growth rate of per capita GDP from 1975- d 1989, and P CGDP75 US is per capita GDP relative to the United States in1975. Numbers in parenthesis are standard errors. Interpret the results. Is there indication of unconditional convergence? What critical value did you use? (5 pts) (b) Although you are quite discouraged by the result, you think that it might be due to the specific time period used. During this period, there were two OPEC oil price shocks with varying degrees of exposure for the OECD countries. You therefore repeat the exercise for the period 1960-1974, with the following results:g7460 = 0 d .061 (0.004) 0.043 (0.007) P CGDP60 US; R2 = 0.613. where g7460 is the average annual growth rate of per capita GDP from 1960- d 1974, and P CGDP60 US is per capita GDP relative to the United States in 1960. Compare this regression to the previous one. (5 pts) (c) You decide to run one more regression in differences. The dependent variable is 5 now the change in the growth rate of per capita GDP from 1960-1974 to 1975- 1989 (diffg) and the regressor the difference in the initial conditions (diffinit). This produces the following graph and regression:Interpret these results. Explain what has happened to unobservable omitted variables that are constant over time. Suggest what some of these variables might be. (5 pts) (d) Given that there are only two time periods, what other methods could you have employed to generate the identical results? Why do you think that the slope coefficient in this regression is significant given the results over the sub-periods? (5 pts)