You must answer the two problem-type questions below, using the ILAC (Issues, Law, Application, Conclusion) format, a worked example of which is in the Resources folder. Please note that the word limit of 2 000 words is a total for both questions (ie, it is not 2 000 words for each question). This is a firm limit - assignments with greater than 2 000 words will lose 1 mark for excessive length. I would however expect that students should be able to answer both questions in far less than 2 000 words. Your bibliography is not included in the word limit but in-text references are. **In this subject, assignments are marked on-line, using an adapted MS Word programme. You therefore MUST submit your assignment in Word format, NOT as a PDF document. If you submit in PDF it will not be able to be marked.

** Question 1 (10 marks) Road Measuring Professionals is a surveying firm based in Newcastle, NSW. Its major client is the New South Wales government, for whom it surveys roads that are under construction. Smith, Jones and Peters have been partners in the firm for some time. There is an agreement between them limiting the authority of the partners to contracts up to $ 10 000. Smith has often purchased surveying equipment on behalf of the firm from Sydney Engineering Supplies, dealing with its manager, Mary. Smith buys a surveying instrument costing $ 11 000 from Mary. It is delivered on 5 June, and the firm receives an invoice for the contracted amount. Smith has always wanted the firm to branch into road transportation, as he is also a qualified truck driver, but his partners have continually rejected such a move. Hoping to demonstrate to them the profitable nature of such work, Smith signs a contract on behalf of the firm to buy an old truck from Used Trucks Ltd for $ 8 500. The firm has received an invoice for the truck, which is due to be delivered on 6 June. Jones and Peters are angry when they see the invoices, and have told both Mary and Used Trucks Ltd that the firm will not pay them. Advise Mary and Used Tricks Ltd as to their legal position, citing relevant law.

Question 2 (10 marks) David Bradbury used to run a second-hand car yard as a sole trader. However, as part of a sentence for fraud imposed by a court two years ago, David was prohibited from buying and selling new or used vehicles for a period of five years. Breach of this order is prosecutable as contempt of court. David is however desperate to go into business again. He hears that a good opportunity exists to start a second-hand car dealership in a suburb of Sydney. He also hears that a vacant lot is available for lease. Because several other businesses are eager to lease it, he rushes to the owner of the site, Cenvest Real Estate Ltd, and signs a 1-year lease for $ 50 000 on 5 January. Occupation of the premises and payment of the $ 50 000 are due to take place on 1 February. He signs the lease David Bradbury, as Managing Director, Sydney Auto Group Pty Ltd. On 10 January he goes to ASIC and registers Sydney Auto Group Pty Ltd. On the ASIC documentation he is listed as sole shareholder and as Managing Director. Sydney Auto Group Pty Ltd starts trading the next day, operating from Davids back yard, buying two old Mercedes cars and selling them to vintage car collectors a few days later. All contracts are signed David Bradbury, as Managing Director, Sydney Auto Group Pty Ltd. On 15 January, David decides that the company needs extra capital, and so his three brothers, Christopher, Anthony and Richard each contribute $ 70 000 to the business in exchange for shares and a position on the board. When the board first meets on 17 January, Christopher is elected Managing Director. At the meeting Christopher, Anthony and Richard say that $ 50 000 is too much for the lease and decide that the company should lease a different lot for $ 30 000. They send a letter to Cenvest Real Estate Ltd stating that Sydney Auto Group Pty Ltd refuses to move its business to the vacant lot and refuse to pay the $ 50 000. David is facing prosecution for contempt of court and has been sued for breach of contract by Cenvest Real Estate Ltd. Advise him on his legal position, citing relevant legal authority.