Young, technically oriented hackers argue that, if the owners of a computer system want to keep outsiders out, it is their responsibility to provide better security. Ken Thompson, one of the inventors of UNIX, said, The act of breaking into a computer system has to have the same social stigma as breaking into a neighbors house. It should not matter that the same that the neighbors door is unlocked. Proposition: It is ethical to access any computer if it does not have any security.

How can we argue for the proposition (the pros ) using Act Utilitarianism ?