Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Your client is the plaintiff in a workers' compensation case. She was injured in 2008 in state A. In 2010, her employer destroyed all the

Your client is the plaintiff in a workers' compensation case. She was injured in 2008 in state A. In 2010, her employer destroyed all the business records relating to the client. The destruction of the records was apparently accidental, not intentional. They were destroyed, however, while the client's workers' compensation claim was pending.

Authority

You have located the following authority, all of which is directly related to the issues raised by the facts of the client's case:

  1. Idle v. City Co. - a 1995 decision by the highest court of state A in which the court created a cause of action in tort for the wrongful destruction of business records. The court ruled that a cause of action exists if the records were destroyed in anticipation of or while a workers' compensation claim was pending. The court also held that a cause of action exists if the destruction was intentional or negligent.
  2. A 2004 state A statute a law passed by thelegislature of state A that created a cause ofaction in tort for the intentional destructionof business records. The statute provides that acause of action exists if the destruction occursin anticipation of or while a workers' compensation claim is pending.

3. Merrick v. Taylora 2005 decision of thecourt of appeals of state A. The court ofappeals is a lower court than the state's highestcourt. The court held that the term intentional, within the meaning of the 2004 statute, includes either the intentional destruction.

of records or the destruction of records as aresult of gross negligence.

4. Davees v. Contractora decision of the highestcourt of state B interpreting a state B statuteidentical to the 2004 state A statute. Thecourt held that the term intentional, as usedin the statute, includes gross negligence onlywhen the gross negligence is accompanied by a"reckless and wanton" disregard for the preservation of the business records.

5. A 2006 federal statutethe statute is identicalto the 2004 state statute but applies only tocontractors with federal contracts.

6. An ALR referenceaddresses specific questions similar to those raised in the client's case.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elliott And Quinns Contract Law

Authors: Frances Quinn

12th Edition

1292251409, 978-1292251400

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Make eye contact when talking and listening

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Do not go, wait until I come

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Pay him, do not wait until I sign

Answered: 1 week ago