Zach want to buy a Baskin and Robbins $($BR$)$ franchise. He has the available cash and his credit score meets the requirements. When reviewing the franchise agreement, he learns the BR requires all franchisees to attend and graduate Baskin and Robbins University $($BRU$).$ Zach thinks this is silly and refuses to go$.$ BR does not complete the sale of the franchise based on his refusal.

BR wins as the requirement was discloised

BR wins if it can show Zach did not act in good faith

Zach wins as the requirement is not reasonable

Zach wins as he meets the financial requirements