Zack is looking to get a new car. Manon works at a car dealership. Manon offers to let Zack drive away with a new car for $$200$ per month. Zack orally agrees. Zack pays $$200$ and drives away in the car. Zack believes he has bou the car while Manon believes she has leased him the car. Is this a valid contract?

Yes, because Manon got $$200$ and gave Zack a benefit in return $($the car$).$

No$,$ because Manon and Zack did not have a common understanding of the terms of the agreement.

Yes, because the parties agreed on a price and Zack paid'it.

No$,$ because the contract was not in writing.

Yes, but only if Zack would have leased the car for the same monthly payment.