Zu and Cathy are negotiating to buy Zu's business. Zu wants to sell her business to Cathy as soon as possible. Zu states that business is located in a prime location and that it makes around $$400,000$ per year. However, last year the business only made $$300,000.$ After the sale, Cathy discovers that the business was not making $$400,000.$ This is an example of fradulent, innocent or negligent misrepresentation.?$$

which one is the relevant law case? Alati v kruger, redgrave v hurd or shaddock and associates pty ltd v parmatta city council?

what is the remedys avaliable in this sitation? rescission and damages, rescission, or damages?