'The impact of nonconstant error variance on OLS estimation: Suppose that Yi xi ...

Question:

'The impact of nonconstant error variance on OLS estimation: Suppose that Yi ¼ α þ βxi þ εi, with independent errors, εi ; Nð0; σ2 i Þ, and σi ¼ σεxi. Let B represent the OLS estimator and b

β the WLS estimator of β.

(a) Show that the sampling variance of the OLS estimator is VðBÞ ¼
PðXi " XÞ
2 σ2 i PðXi " XÞ
2 h i2 and that the sampling variance of the WLS estimator is VðβbÞ ¼ σ2 ε Pw2 i ðXi " Xe Þ
2 where Xe [ ð
Pw2 i XiÞ=ð
Pw2 i Þ. (Hint: Write each slope estimator as a linear function of the Yi.)

(b) Now suppose that x is uniformly distributed over the interval ½x0; ax0), where x0 > 0 and a > 0, so that a is the ratio of the largest to the smallest σi. The efficiency of the OLS estimator relative to the optimal WLS estimator is Vðβb Þ=VðBÞ, and the relative precision of the OLS estimator is the square root of this ratio, that is, SDðβb Þ=SDðBÞ.
Calculate the relative precision of the OLS estimator for all combinations of a ¼ 2, 3, 5, 10 and n ¼ 5, 10, 20, 50, 100. For example, when a ¼ 3 and n ¼ 10, you can take the x-values as 1, 1.222, 1:444; ... ; 2:778, 3. Under what circumstances is the OLS estimator much less precise than the WLS estimator?

(c) The usual variance estimate for the OLS slope (assuming constant error variance) is Vb ðBÞ ¼ S2 E PðXi " XÞ
2 where S2 E ¼ PE2 i =ðn " 2Þ. Kmenta (1986, Section 8.2) shows that the expectation of this variance estimator (under nonconstant error variance σ2 i ) is E½Vb ðBÞ) ¼ σ2 PðXi " XÞ
2 "
PðXi " XÞ
2 ðσ2 i " σ2Þ
ðn " 2Þ½PðXi " XÞ
2 )
2 where σ2 [ Pσ2 i =n. (*Prove this result.) Kmenta also shows that the true variance of the OLS slope estimator, VðBÞ [derived in part (a)], is generally different from E½Vb ðBÞ). If E½Vb ðBÞ)=VðBÞ
q is substantially below 1, then the usual formula for the standard deviation of B will lead us to believe that the OLS estimator is more precise than it really is. Calculate E½Vb ðBÞ)=VðBÞ
q under the conditions of part (b), for a ¼ 5, 10, 20, 50 and n ¼ 5, 10, 20, 50, 100. What do you conclude about the robustness of validity of OLS inference with respect to nonconstant error variance?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: