Using the arguments of this section, can you give a reasonable explanation why the elements F and

Question:

Using the arguments of this section, can you give a reasonable explanation why the elements F and Cl are gases, that is, why a molecule of two F or Cl atoms would be very weakly bound? In particular, without knowing details of the molecular states, why would you expect F2 to have about half the binding energy of O2? (The actual ratio is about one-third).

It would seem that in the LCAO approximation there is no reason for noble gases like Ne and Ar to ever form molecules or solids. Solids of these materials are possible, however. They are bound by the much weaker van der Waals force.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: