In Turpin v. Sortini, the California Supreme Court said it was difficult to understand how awarding damages

Question:

In Turpin v. Sortini, the California Supreme Court said it was difficult to understand how awarding damages to a child who would not have been born if not for the defendants’ negligence “would disavow the value of life.” Depreciate is probably more apt than disavow in the context of that sentence. Can you construct the moral argument that as a public policy matter, such an award would depreciate the value of human life?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: