Cornelia and Ed Kornfeld contracted to sell a signed Picasso print to David

Tunick, Inc. The print, entitled Le Minotauromachie, was signed “Pablo

Picasso.” The signature on the print was discovered to be a forgery, and the

Kornfelds offered Tunick a substitute Picasso print. Tunick refused the

Kornfelds’ substituted performance and demanded a return of the contract

price. The Kornfelds refused on the grounds that their cure had been refused.

Was the substitute print an adequate cure? [David Tunick, Inc. v Kornfeld, 838

F Supp 848 (SDNY)]

596 Part 3 Sales and Leases of Goods

AppendixLO1