The auditing literature had traditionally classified fraud as either defalcations or financial reporting fraud. Required a. What
Question:
The auditing literature had traditionally classified fraud as either “defalcations” or “financial reporting fraud.”
Required
a. What is the difference between the two types of fraud?
b. Does the auditor’s responsibility for detecting fraud vary with the nature of the fraud committed?
c. Is a defalcation or financial reporting fraud more difficult to detect? Explain and give an example to support your conclusion.
d. Explain how the personnel committing each type of fraud may differ and how the motivations to commit the fraud might differ. Use the following format in formulating your answer:
Defalcation Financial Reporting Fraud
Personnel Most Likely to Commit the Fraud
Most Likely Motivation to Commit the Fraud
Process Used to Rationalize the Fraud
Step by Step Answer:
Auditing a business risk appraoch
ISBN: 978-0324375589
6th Edition
Authors: larry e. rittenberg, bradley j. schwieger, karla m. johnston