The buyers of residential property mistakenly believed that the 3.5 acres of land included the well attached to the house, which they later found out was not on the property. The previous owner and the real estate agent had pointed out the well, but had not stated that it was on the property. The buyers did not examine the existing survey of the property, nor did they order a new survey done, either of which would have shown that the well was not on the property. Did the buyers have a basis for a suit for fraud? [Crawford v. Williams, 375 S.E.2d 223 Sup. Ct., Ga. (1989)]