The Free Enterprise Fund and a Rwanda accounting firm filed a constitutional challenge to the creation of
Question:
The plaintiffs made three constitutional challenges. First, they claimed that the appointment of the PCAOB members by the SEC violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution (art. II, § 2), which empowers the President to appoint “Officers of the United States” while giving Congress the power to vest the appointment of “inferior officers” in the President, courts of law, or heads of departments. The plaintiffs argued that because PCAOB members are neither appointed nor supervised on a day-to-day basis by principal officers directly accountable to the President, they are not inferior officers, and therefore must be appointed by the President. Second, the plaintiffs claimed that the appointment of the PCAOB members violated the separation of powers because the members were not removable at will by the President. The President can remove SEC commissioners for cause, and the SEC can remove the PCAOB members for good cause, however. Third, the plaintiffs claimed that Congress violated the nondelegation doctrine by unlawfully delegating legislative power to the PCAOB in violation of Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, which vests all legislative powers in the Congress. How should the court rule? [Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24310 (D.D.C., Mar. 21, 2007).]
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Managers and the Legal Environment Strategies for the 21st Century
ISBN: 978-0324582048
6th Edition
Authors: Constance E Bagley, Diane W Savage
Question Posted: