Vince Lutriario claims that the defendant, A World of Pets and Supplies (A World of Pets), sold him a dog infected with Giardia. Lutriario sought to recover the price of the dog and the costs he incurred curing the dog. The marshal who went to A World of Pets was told that the store no longer existed and was now World of Pups. Lutriario had previously talked to the owner of A World of Pets (also the owner of the World of Pups) and had arranged a payment plan to be reimbursed. Now, however, the defendant sought an order vacating the judgment that led to that plan and claimed that World of Pups was distinct and separate from the original defendant, A World of Pets. Despite the name change, there appeared to be continuity not only of management and owner but also of physical location, assets, and general business operation. Was there a de facto . . . between the two "Worlds"? Lutriario v. A World of Pets and Supplies, Ltd., 907 N.Y.S.2d 101 (Civ. Ct. 2010).