Karl Niklas and T.G. Owens examined the differences in a particular plant, Plantago Major L., when grown

Question:

Karl Niklas and T.G. Owens examined the differences in a particular plant, Plantago Major L., when grown in full sunlight versus shade conditions. In this study, shaded plants received direct sunlight for less than 2 hours each day, whereas full-sun plants were never shaded. A partial summary of the data based on n1 = 16 full-sun plants and n2 = 15 shade plants is shown here:
Karl Niklas and T.G. Owens examined the differences in a

a. What assumptions are required in order to use the small-sample procedures given in this chapter to compare full-sun versus shade plants? From the summary presented, do you think that any of these assumptions have been violated?
b. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean leaf area for full-sun versus shade plants?
c. Do the data present sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in mean overlap area for full-sun versus shade plants?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Introduction To Probability And Statistics

ISBN: 9781133103752

14th Edition

Authors: William Mendenhall, Robert Beaver, Barbara Beaver

Question Posted: