1. AMERICAN WELL WORKS CO. v. LAYNE & BOWLER CO., 241 U.S. 257, 36 S.Ct. 585, 60...

Question:

1. AMERICAN WELL WORKS CO. v. LAYNE & BOWLER CO., 241 U.S. 257, 36 S.Ct.

585, 60 L.Ed. 987 (1916), involved a claim by a pump manufacturer that a competitor had damaged its reputation by telling customers that plaintiff’s pump infringed defendant’s patent. The Supreme Court held that there was no federal jurisdiction over the suit because the claim did not arise under the federal patent law, but rather was a state cause of action.

Justice Holmes explained:

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Civil Procedure Cases And Materials

ISBN: 9780314280169

11th Edition

Authors: Jack Friedenthal, Arthur Miller, John Sexton, Helen Hershkoff

Question Posted: