A researcher used data on these three variables for 60 universities randomly selected from the 229 national

Question:

A researcher used data on these three variables for 60 universities randomly selected from the 229 national universities in U.S. News & World Report’s rankings of U.S. colleges and universities: Y = graduation rate (mean 59.65), X1 = student body’s median math plus reading SAT score (mean 1,030.5), and X2 = percent of student body with GPAs among the top 10 percent at their high school (mean = 46.6). He found a statistically significant positive relationship between SAT scores and graduation rate:image text in transcribed

The standard errors are in parentheses and the t values are in brackets. He also found a statistically significant positive relationship between GPA and graduation rate:image text in transcribed

But when he included both SAT scores and GPAs in a multiple regression model, the estimated effect of GPAs on graduation rates was very small and not statistically significant at the 5 percent level:image text in transcribed

a. He suspected that there was an error in his multiple regression results. Is it possible for a variable to be statistically significant in a simple regression but not significant in a multiple regression?

b. Do you think that X1 and X2 are positively correlated, negatively correlated, or uncorrelated?

c. If your reasoning in b is correct, how would this explain the fact that the coefficients of X1 and X2 are lower in the multiple regression than in the simple regression equations?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: