53 Factors that affect an auditor’s judgment. A study was conducted to determine the effects of linguistic delivery style and client credibility on auditors’ judgments ( Advances in Accounting and Behavioral Research , 2003). Each of 200 auditors from “Big 5” accounting firms were asked to assume that he or she was an audit team supervisor of a new manufacturing client and was performing an analytical review of the client’s financial statement. The researchers gave the auditors different information on the client’s credibility and the linguistic delivery style of the client’s explanation. Each auditor then provided an assessment of the likelihood that the client’s explanation accounts for the fluctuation in the financial statement. The three variables of interest—credibility (x1), linguistic delivery style (x2), and likelihood ( y )—were all measured on a numerical scale. Regression analysis was used to fit the interaction model y = b0 + b1 x1 + b2 x2 + b3 x1 x2 +

e. The results are summarized in the table below.

a. Interpret the phrase “client credibility and linguistic delivery style interact” in the words of the problem.

b. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing the overall adequacy of the model.

c. Conduct the test suggested in part b , using the information in the table.

d. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether client credibility and linguistic delivery style interact.

e. Conduct the test suggested in part d , using the information in the table.

f. The researchers estimated the slope of the likelihood–

linguistic delivery style line at a low level of client credibility (x1 = 22). Obtain this estimate and interpret it in the words of the problem.

g. The researchers also estimated the slope of the likelihood–linguistic delivery style line at a high level of client credibility (x1 = 46). Obtain this estimate and interpret it in the words of the problem.

Transcribed Image Text:

Results for Exercise 53 Beta Estimate Std Error t-statistic p-value Constant Client credibility (x1) Linguistic delivery style (x2) Interaction (x1x2) 15.865 10.980 1.445 0.150 0.037 0.339 0.110 0.913 -0.678 0.328 -2.064 0.040 0.036 0.009 4.008 <0.005 F = 55.35 (p < 0.0005); Adjusted R = 450