Adding a Department (CMA) The management of Bay Company is considering a proposal to install a third production department within its existing factory building. With the company’s present production setup, raw material is passed through Department I to produce materials A and B in equal proportions. Material A is then passed through Department II to yield product C.

Material B is presently being sold “as is” at a price of $20.25 per pound. Product C has a selling price of $100.00 per pound.

The per-pound standard costs currently being used by the Bay Company are as follows:

DEPARTMENT |! DEPARTMENT I! (MATERIALS A&B) (PRODUCT C) (MATERIAL B)
Prior department costs — $53.03 $13.47 Direct material 20.00 — _ Direct labor 7.00 12.00 _—
Variable overhead 3.00 5.00 —
Fixed overhead:
Attributable PAPAS 2.25 _ Allocated (2/3, 1/3) 1.00 1.00 _ ; $33.25 $73.28 $13.47 These standard costs were developed by using an estimated production volume of 200,000 pounds of raw material as the denominator volume. The company assigns Department I costs to materials A and B in proportion to their net sales values at the point of separation, computed by deducting subsequent standard production costs from sales prices. The $300,000 of common fixed overhead costs are allocated to the two producing departments on the basis of the space used by the departments.

“Attributable overhead” is that amount of fixed overhead that could be avoided if a given product or activity were discontinued. The proposed Department III would be used to process material B into product D. It is expected that any quantity of product D can be sold for $30.00 per pound. Standard costs per pound under this proposal were devel- oped by using 200,000 pounds of raw material as the denominator volume and are as follows:
DEPARTMENT | DEPARTMENT II DEPARTMENT III (MATERIALS A&B) (PRODUCT C) (PRODUCT D)
Prior department costs — $52.80 $13.20 Direct material $20.00 _ _ Direct labor 7.00 12.00 5.50 Variable overhead 3.00 5.00 2.00 Fixed overhead:
Attributable 2.25 2.25 Uei5)
Allocated (1/2, 1/4, 1/4) 08 HS iS de $33.00 $72.80 $23.20 If

(a) sales and production levels are expected to remain constant in the foreseeable future, and

(b) there are no foreseeable alternative uses for the available factory space, should the Bay Company install Department III and thereby produce product D? Show calculations to support your answer.
. Instead of constant sales and production levels, suppose that under the present production setup $1,000,000 additions to the factory building must be made every 10 years to accommodate growth. Suppose also that proper maintenance gives these factory additions an infinite life and that all such maintenance costs are included in the standard costs set forth in the text of the problem.
How would the analysis that you performed in part A be changed if the installation of Department III shortened the interval at which the $1,000,000 factory additions are made from 10 years to 6 years? Be as specific as possible in your answer.