A female doctor, just out of medical school, went to work at a family medical clinic. Her supervisor, a doctor, was also the sole owner of the clinic. A few weeks after she had started work, her supervisor showed her an X-ray of his hip that clearly displayed his penis (which he referred to on many occasions as “Mr. Happy”). During a staff meeting the supervisor said that he “was very glad that his wife had had a c-section with their triplets because she still had a nice, tight pu**y” (the female doctor was not at that particular meeting but it was reported to her). The supervisor regularly made comments about his wife and their sex life. Without apparent justification, he admonished the female doctor about dressing appropriately and not displaying her breasts. The supervisor showed the female doctor photos from his beach vacation that featured topless women and men in speedos. On another occasion, the supervisor emerged from an examination room with his shirt off and asked the female doctor if she wanted to join him in the room. While the female doctor was away, the supervisor told one of her patients that she was busy “screwing” her husband. The supervisor told dirty jokes within the plaintiff ’s hearing two or three times a month. He made derogatory comments about female drug representatives, including that one representative looked good for having had three kids and that he “would like a piece of that.” When the female doctor was pregnant, the supervisor made comments about “how fat she looked” and the size of her breasts. He made numerous offers to assist her in pumping breast milk and speculated about how breast feeding affected her libido (“probably a wild thing in bed”). On yet another occasion, the supervisor claimed to have seen a drop of breast milk on the plaintiff ’s desk and said that he “wanted to lick it up.” He also said that the female doctor owed it to him to let him help her pump breast milk because he was helping her pay certain legal fees. The woman resigned shortly after the last incident, after a little over two years of employment at the clinic. She sued. What should the court decide? Why?