Assess the argument that the federal government should subsidize terrorism insurance for major office buildings and stadiums because one building’s precautions make another building a more likely target. What is the externality involved here?What is the theory of terrorist motivation? Of terrorist information? Why shouldn’t the government tax precautions instead of subsidizing them? Should the government subsidize other forms of crime insurance as well? Should there be distinctions among the different kinds of antiterrorism measures a building’s owners could take?