1. A rationale for your intervention that is grounded in the research literature (-2 pages). This rationale should include a minimum of 5 annotated references from peer reviewed sources. This means that you need to go into the library journal database to look for research articles as opposed to googling various websites. The research you review should support your intervention. You can complete this individually or you may hand in one paper per group but all students are expected to contribute actively to each week's rationale. 2. Individual: A time log of your intervention, including the dates and times that you stood at the board as well as a pictures of your intervention. This log should also include your summary of the ways in which each of your group member's contributed to the intervention. 3. A reflection on whether you felt this particular intervention was effective and what you might do differently next time (if anything) - - Ipg. This should be individual and based on your personal experiences at the board